Definitions
Section 473a(3)(b) defines 7-OH as a synthetic form of kratom. It is not. 7-hydroxymitragynine occurs naturally in the leaf and is the compound the human body makes from mitragynine — calling it synthetic in a statute does not make it so, it just means the statute describes something that does not exist. And the error compounds: because subsection (3)(a) sweeps in the leaf and every preparation of it, and the leaf naturally contains 7-OH, the two definitions overlap. Read literally, natural leaf contains a “synthetic variant”, which means the FDA exception in (2) — which expressly does not cover synthetic variants — cannot reach any kratom product at all. Whatever one thinks of prohibition, that drafting needs fixing before anyone votes on it. Section 3(d) of our model act defines the molecule by what it is in any form, which is the only definition a laboratory can actually test against.